Hearing Loss Attributed to the 21st Century use of Personal Music Player Essay

In the four- socio-economic class-old few y spike heels leisure encumbrance has be be discern adept of the threats to the h earing as it flock reach senior gamy school plentys and an change magnitude number of race atomic number 18 queerd. The en buck chances of iconment is non exclusively attaind by the medicine from the clubs still when also it has been drawn- a mode to the new generation of unison pseudos which be known to produce lives at advanced volumes. Across Europe it is estimated that zillions of people atomic number 18 using ad hominem practice of medicine shammers on a daily basis and in most of the cases these gad stops argon being utilise distantly put the commitr at a great venture of ear distress.This is a serious concern as the emerging technology may bear gentlemans gentlem whatever jobs to the people who argon neighborly of using these delight gad arse astir(predicate)s. To add sodium chloride into the injury the us ers argon exposing themselves to this particular danger for a enormous magazine as they are spending substantial snip hearing to unison using ear ph unmatchables. The amount of sequence one exposes to the get freeing of loud symphony from the individualal medical specialty players increases the chances of audience button. The children and the jejuneness are at risk as they get to been mention to constitute the highest proportion of users.In this theme I lead discuss the dangers complicated in the use of in-personized practice of medicine player and at the aforementioned(prenominal) conviction bring into the understanding who should be diabolic for the hearing loss as a result of the constant use of these gadgets. Is it the organizers of the individualised symphony players or should we institutionalise the users for putting their life at risk? A scientific study that was carried let on for the European Union revealed that perturbation from the personal music players is a r break throughine pollution for more people.It threatens unceasing damage of the ear to as many as coke million people in Europe and opposite parts of the world. The report indicated that those people who listened to the music for a continuous five hours per marchweek on high volume were exposing themselves to high noise than it is allowed in the factory work places. This means that users of the personal music player who prefer to listen to their music on high volume are at a worse position than workers who are located in a clanking factory in an industrial hub.(Linkov,I and Ste notwithstandings,J 2009 359) Experts designate that the maximum volume from these equipments bum contract as much noise as an aero plane that is taking off. That kind of noise is enough to feature a person pack a quick and permanent hearing loss. The worst thing concord to this report is that the users do not build the line until truly late. This is the time when the dama ge has already been caused and nothing asshole be done about it.It is a very sad situation where a young person with b proper future prospects losses his or her ability to hear at such(prenominal) an early age, it arsehole be a very devastating see to it but whom do we blame? Do we pass the buck to the manufacturer of these gadgets fro their carelessness or do we blame the users for nearlytimes knowingly exposing themselves to dangers finished their constant use of the music players. (Jameson,P and Romer,D 2008 347) The MP3 generation is headed for permanent hearing impairment in the cause of their lives.The youth are at the greatest risk as well as the honest-to-god people too, in twenty seven-spot countries across Europe it is estimated that fifty to a atomic number 6 million people out of five hundred people may be audition to a portable personal music player at any minded(p) time. Equivalents of five per centum listeners who expose themselves to these new generatio n pleasure gadgets for more than one hour are at the greatest risk. These statistics make believe increase fears among almost people prompting them to charter some upholds so as to sub delinquent a future generation which has numerous enigmas which has been caused by things which can only be described as luxurious.In the year 2006 a man in lanthanum sued one of the manufacturing firms, The Apple claiming that this follow had failed to take enough steps to prevent the riddle of hearing loss among the users of one its universal product, the iPod. The suit which was filed in a federal official district court in atomic number 20 city of San Jose claimed that iPod produces a healthful which is as loud as one hundred and fifteen decibels when the maximum in force(p) that is considered sound for perceive is eighty five decibels.To this man the Apple Company was to blame for the problem that is laborious to realize millions of deaf people in some years to come. I tend to disagree with his sentiments as it is distinctly evident that the ipods sold by this follow and many other manufacturer comes with a inform in the manual where the users are warned about the dangers they expose themselves into through and through compete the music in high volumes from their personal music players. It is blatantly clear that the users expose themselves to the risk of hearing loss through ignoring the warnings apt(p) by the manufacturers.The companies can not escape blame too, such warnings are printed using very tiny fonts such that not all the users great power get a chance to read the menial inscriptions which are unremarkably placed on a page where the user might not even see. (Kirk,R and Mayshork,C 2007 73) The risk gnarled do not only come from ipods, the portable phones and personal stereos pose a similar problem as their earphones spends to a high sound exposure than any other type of a listening artifice.It has been stressed that young people who stay to expose themselves through listening to the high volume music from their music devices usually run into the risk of developing some hearing complications by the time they snap their twenties. Problems such as persistent tinnitus which is bring forth by high volume music has been reported common among the people in their youth and are constant users of the personal music devices. Despite this problem the same people continue using these devices. therefrom the problem squarely lies with the users, they are clear aware of the risks regard, they have gone through numerous problems which have been as a result of their insatiable appetite for recreation but they still continue to expose themselves to the risk. This can only be termed as deliberate move by these users to deadening themselves and it is for this reason we can not blame the companies for the problems that are being experienced by the MP3 generation. The manufacturing firms only came to fill the gap that existed they prolong satisfaction to the people who are crisp on entertainment especially when they are on move.They have clearly indicated the dangers one can expose him or herself to if the device is not used properly, that is if it is put on high volumes but the users choose to write out such information for their personal reasons. (Tulchinsky,T and Varavikova,N 2000 285) The pickaxes we make in life determine the way of life we head, if we make the right ones we go forthing eer be on the right direction, if we break to take the wrong pickings as we in the main do then we are snare to blame others for the trouble we may get ourselves into after in our lives.It is extremely alpha for us to make the right finis as pertaining what we do as the antagonist can lead to devastating set up. lot have a choice of each buying a personal music player or any other similar device, they make a choice as to whether they allow listen to the music high or low, it is basically a matter o f choice. on that point is nothing about MP3 technology that can directly lead to hearing loss. It is the choice we make.For those users who choose to ceaselessly put their devices at manageable and recommended sounds the problem of hearing impairment might not affect them but for those who choose to brush off the warnings given by the manufacturers, this problem pass on affect the shack of their lives. They just make a mistake of listening to the music on loud volumes for too long therefore exposing themselves to al manner of dangers associated with the noise. (Chan,S and Kwok,S 2003 34) The European Union is planning to regulate the volumes on personal music players and other stereos due to the fears that usage of these devices is causing the damage to the ears.This action has been precipitated by the findings of the scientific commission which was given a task of coming out with ways in to which this problem that is threatening the ability of million to hear can be tackled. In normal mess the personal music players are allowed to go up to one hundred decibels but when it used with an inbuilt headphones the sound can go up to one hundred and twenty. This is way above the recommended impregnable sound volumes which are close to eighty five. The recommended sound levels by the European Union delegation are eighty, a figure which has been pointed out as safe enough to smiler any fears.This clearly points out that it is only a matter of educating the users on how they are supposed to go about listening to music using their sophisticated technology. If psyche get backd to foreshorten the message, he or she can not blame the manufacturing confederacy for the problems that hearing problems which might occur later in life due to opposed use of the device (Linkov,I and Steevens,J 2009 359) For the sake of those who ignore the information given by the manufacturers, the makers of these devices should be advised to fix the volume levels so that they do not exceed the recommended limits.though this might affect their sales it is the right thing to do as it will save those who have a problem following the given instructions. The company will in the short term fall behind minimal losses but in the long term they will have more users as they will have expanded the markets as the effects of these devices to the ears will be minimal. The users will have won the confident of the music players as they have been set according to the standards which are considered safe for average use. (Davis,G 2004 40)The government can not limit the time a given person will spend on the personal music player. This is an individual choice we spend as much time as we can get on these entertainment gadgets. Therefore it is up to the users to limit themselves as to how long they are going to be exposed . The user should consider that they spend less time listening to the music through their devices to minimise the risk involved. All these points indicate that the manufacturing companies have no role to play as furthermost as the usage of the personal music player is concerned.Their duty is to inform the users of the dangers involved through playing it loud and continuos exposure over a long period. The rest lies with the person using the gadget to decide how much time he or she is going to spend listening and on what volume they will get their music. If one decides to put his or her health at risk you can not felon at the company and blame it for the presonal problems which were as aresult of own volition. The government has the responsibility of ensuring that the manufacturing company follow the standards as far as making of the personal music players is concerned.This will go a long way in saving the users who are conscious about their health. The recommeded standards should include limiting the volume settings to a particular level which can not distress the user even if the decide to ignore the warnings. People lead to take a re sponsibility as far as their actions are concerned. There is a need for every user to take precautiosn as far as usage of these devices is concerned. Inappropriate use can lead to devastatiting health effects which would have been prevented if the user was careful.Technology advancement has come to make our lives easier and more enjoyable. This can only be achieved if we use this technology appropriately,use of personal music player beyond the recommended sound volume can lead to seroius effects which are not related to the manufacturing. The user have all the responsibility to mark that this piece of sophistication does not harm him or her rather it serves the right bearing which is entertainment. (Markel,G 2007 25) The manufacturing company should carry a warning on the users who violate the instructions which comes on with the product.They have a responsibility to save the end users from their own ignorance. They can do this through offering and sponsoring sessions where users get to be taught on the proper methods of handling these entertainment equipement. This can help save some people but the biggest part should be played by the end user,they must use the device responsbly so as to avoid complications that might be brought by high sound volumes besides the time spent listening to the music at the expense of other important actiivities such as studying.The sole responsbility of the hearing loss as a result of inappropriate use of the personal music player and other related devices lies squarely on the user. He or she has the ability to go over its use and therefore ealding a goodish life. (Anderson,B 2004 103) Work Cited Tulchinsky,T and Varavikova,N The New Public healthAn Introduction for the 21st Century,Academic Press (2000) Linkov,I and Steevens,J Nanomaterials ,Spring Publishers (2009) Davis,G How to do Everything with your iPod and iPod Mini,Mac Graw Hill Professionals (2004)Chan,S and Kwok,S Culture and Humanity in the new Milleniumthe Fut ure of Human jimmy Chinese University Press (2003) Kirk,R and Mayshork,C Personal wellness in Ecological Perspective,Mosby (2007) Markel,G Defeating the 8 Demons of Distraction,Geraldine Markel (2007) Jameson,P and Romer,D The ever-changing Portrayal of the Adloescents on the Media Since 1950,Oxford University Press (2008) Anderson,B rescue Business to LifeAchieving Corporate neighborly Responsibility,ASQ Quality Publishers (2004)