A SYSTEM TO MANAGE THE POSTGRADUATE COMPUTING PROJECTS Literature review

A SYSTEM TO MANAGE THE POSTGRADUATE COMPUTING PROJECTS - Literature review moralIn order to perpetrate configuration trouble, this research indicates that Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) reading 1.1, and the Project IN Controlled Environment (PRINCE) version 2 calls attention to the proper execution of Configuration reign over activities because of their criticality for the successful operation of the product in the deployment environment. Focusing on the similarities and correlation in the midst of these dickens initiatives, author has mapped PRINCE 2 Configuration Management Component to the CM process in continuous representation. To gain good transformation results there is a need to apply appropriate software metrics on each and every sub process and sub practice. According to the authors idea, mapping betwixt two initiatives is never so easy because it requires the specification of suitable saltiness level of maps between models. On high level it may be h ard to get sufficient understanding of commonalities and variations while on a low level it may result in a large number of connections, gull it hard to achieve the appropriate mapping. The mapping performed according to the proposed approach shows that PRINCE 2 and CMMI 1.1 continuous representation take up with the vomit up causement by following an improved process instruction approach. Principally the configuration management activities in aforementioned standards are normally correlated to each other at higher coarseness level. It is nearly impractical to achieve one to one mapping between these two and low granularity level because of differences in process improvement approach adopted by CMMI at optimizing level (Luqman, 2006). (Dr. Asim ur rehman et al., 2007), high spot the importance of the understanding of mangers about the strategies being adopted for the management of different aspects of the project. According to their views, Managers while managing a project, t end to show the preference for a specific project management strategy. They find it difficult to manage another project if a dissimilar project management is adopted. Because they usually are in soon of knowledge about how much commonality exists between the preferred and the new required project management methodology. This research is basically focused towards that enhancement of understanding of managers by providing highlighting different aspects of different project management frameworks. Results can be useful by intelligently combining powerful features of different methodologies. To perform the analysis five major project management methodologies, including PRINCE2, have been compared with PMBOK. Prince2 methodology has certain shortcomings when compared with other methodologies. PRINCE2 is not designed to promise proficient results in short period of time. It requires deep concentration from the managers to get the promised results and alike it is insufficient if the proje ct requires higher degree of contract and people management. This research also highlights certain commonalities between PMBOK and PRINCE2 such as the documentation must provide sufficient information to suit the occasion. Usually it does not provide information about how to perform a specific task or use either of the tools described. They are intended to provide a brief sketch of processes involved, their